HomeWorldBack to coal in...

Back to coal in the EU. Concerns from Brussels: NGOs

The announcement of increased coal use in Germany, Austria and the Netherlands has raised concerns among European Commission environmental groups, which point to the dangers of the EU’s climate ambitions.

“The risk is to replace one addiction with another”

«We must ensure that we use this crisis to move forward“Energy transition,”no step back to polluting fossil fuels“European Executive Director Ursula von der Leyen said in an interview with a number of European media outlets on Tuesday. «Finding balance is subtle, it is not written that we will take the right directionHe warned. The Netherlands on Monday decided to completely lift restrictions on coal-fired power generation, while Berlin and Vienna announced on Sunday that they would use it more to offset the decline in Russian gas supplies to Europe. «This is a bad option, after a decade of delay or neglect, states have continued to bet on fossil fuels rather than investing enough in renewable energy.Viewed by Neil Makaroff, Réseau Action Climat (RAC) from the Federation of Environmental NGOs. «The risk is to replace one dependence with another: to import Colombian or Australian coal, American or Qatari liquefied natural gas, to replace Russian hydrocarbons.“He told AFP he was concerned thatthese short-term regressions become structural regressions«.

“It should remain as temporary as possible”

«This is a matter of concern, even if it is not about new investments in coal, but about reopening existing plants or using more. It should be as temporary as possible“Sam Van den Plus, the NGO’s Carbon Market Watch, is plentiful. «How these countries will be able to implement their coal mining plans is in jeopardy.և The trajectory of their CO2 emission reduction as:If emissions of coal are higher, other industries will have to reduce their emissions more“, He claims.

First of all, he mentions thischarcoal solution“You should not be encouraged to rest”Investments in renewable energy, storage, energy efficiency, demand reduction«. «Wanting coal to save us from a crisis caused largely by fossil fuels is like banging your head against a wall to cure a migraine.“, Angers Greenpeace Europe Communications Manager Mark Brady. According to him, the priority should be the sharp reduction of electricity needs, as “Huge amounts of energy are wasted, from industry to agriculture, from transport to housing»Poorly insulated.


Source: Le Figaro

- A word from our sponsors -

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More from Author

- A word from our sponsors -

Read Now

What are the differences between drawing and live action? Director reveals

Director shares what will be the differences between the 2000s design and the first live-action of 'Lilo & Stitch'; Find out!The release of one of this year's most anticipated live-action, 'Lilo & Stitch', is approaching! The feature, which will be based on the classic 2000s animation of...

Sirov whispers from a pre -trial detention center under the path

The exception of the fiscal service of Ukraine Roman Nasirov left the preliminary center of maintenance. .in_text_content_22 {width: 300px; Height: 600px; } @Media (min-width: 600px) {.in_text_content_22 {width: 580px; Height: 400px; }} .Adsbygoogle {Touch-Action: Manipulation; } This was reported to the public...