Prosecutors convict Antauro Humala before prosecutors for apologizing for terrorism

Terrorism lawyer filed a criminal complaint against public ministry, a Antauro Humala Tasso for the crime of an apology for terrorism, after he stated via social media that “the best that the left has given so far as a political party, shining path”.

This was said on January 24, which became viral on the social network. tik tak where the Prosecutor General’s Office considered “apologetic content”, and the legal basis is Articles 316 and 316-A of the Criminal Code.

“You have to be realists, we, like ethnocaceristas, are mathematicians, we are scientists, we say things as they are. The best thing the left has done, from Pizarro to the present day, as a political party, shining path!”, said Antauro Humala.

According to this argument, the Attorney General’s Office considered that these expressions amounted to the crime of apologizing for terrorism, “for exonerating the Sendero Luminoso terrorist organization”.

Basics

As part of the preliminary investigation advocate Specialists pointed out that the manifestation Antauro Humalawatch video tik takcontact Direct to send a report on the content of the leader ethnocacerista’s phrases, among other things.

In addition, he argued that unlawful acts of terrorism “constitute multiple offensive criminal offenses because they affect the democratic political system established by Constitution and public peace.

In addition, the crime has “constitutional content, which is part of the legal good it protects, namely public peace – public peace.”

“Not knowing this leads to not knowing why it is being punished and therefore not being able to determine the meaning of the punishment,” said advocate.

This is also confirmed by the case Marcelino Tineo Silva in that constitutional Court where they state that “the state has the right to suppress those actions which, by their exercise, seek to destroy the very democratic system as a natural environment for the enjoyment and exercise of all fundamental human rights, and as soon as the elevation affects the rules of democracy of pluralism, tolerance and the search for consensus.”