adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_judiciales_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
constitutional Court declared the writ of habeas corpus filed by the defense of President Pedro Castillo valid and ordered that the proceedings against him on charges of treason be annulled.
The Greatest Interpreter Constitution also declared invalid the final report approved by Subcommittee on Constitutional Charges (SAC), which recommended that charges be brought against the head of state.
“The Constitutional Court, with the powers vested in it by the Political Constitution of Peru, has ruled that the habeas corpus petition is valid and Void the agreement of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Charges of the Congress of the Republic of February 28, 2022 on the acceptance of the complaint against the favored party, as well as the Final Report of the Constitutional Complaint 219 on the violation of the right to adequate motivation at the headquarters of the Parliament”, can be read in the decision of the TC.
Recall that with 11 votes in favor and 10 against, the SAC approved the final report, supported by Avanza País congressman Diego Bazan, who recommended that Castillo Terrones be charged with treason. The process was then in the hands of the Standing Commission so that it could later be discussed and voted upon in plenary session.
Congressional Attorney fails to challenge treason in Constitutional Court plenary session
It should be noted that the Deputy Attorney of Congress, Yuri Ivan Garcia Cano, hastened to support the complaint against the president before the plenary meeting of the TC. At that time the magistrate Gustavo Gutierrez Tix asked him “what is the typical act that the president of the republic has done to charge him with the supposed crime of treason against the motherland.”
“If we see the final report, then what you recommend is an unfinished crime, as can be seen from the final report submitted by the subcommittee, so it qualifies it as an attempt,” the prosecutor replied.
However, Gutiérrez Thiesé questioned said intervention: “Is opinion a crime? This position worries me a lot.”, said.
A day later, Alianza Para el Progreso spokesman Alejandro Soto criticized Garcia Cano’s performance and felt that he would be dealing with a “mole in Congress”.
Source: RPP
I am Emma White and I currently work for Buna Times. My specialty is the politics section of the website, where I aim to provide readers with informative and engaging content on current events. In addition to my professional experience in journalism, I hold a Bachelor’s degree in English Literature from Princeton University.