NEW YORK (AP) – A judge who handled Sarah Palin’s defamation case against the New York Times denied her request for a retrial Tuesday, and said she didn’t file “even a fraction” of the evidence needed to prove the actual crime of the newspaper.
U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff released the statement in writing because he denied Palin’s attorneys’ request.
His lawyers asked the judge to schedule a retrial or disqualify him as having a bias against him, citing many of Rakoff’s decisions that he claimed were wrong. This ranges from questioning the jury to selecting the jury and ends with the jury’s instructions when asking questions during the review.
“In fact, none of them are wrong, let alone the basis for Palin’s retrial,” the judge said.
Rakoff wrote that, despite further motions for investigation, Palin would have to prove at trial earlier this year that the error in the published editorial was motivated by factual wrongdoing – a court request for defamation. -puri. involving public figures.
“And the amazing thing about the trial here is that Palin, despite all of his early evidence, ultimately didn’t show even a small amount of that evidence,” he said.
Palin’s lawyers declined to comment on Rakoff’s decision.
New York Times lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Palin, a former Republican vice-presidential candidate and former Alaskan governor, was charged with defamation in a 2017 newspaper op-ed that falsely linked his election rhetoric to mass shootings, which Palin said damaged his reputation. and career.
The Times admitted their editing was inaccurate, but said it was quick to correct what they called an “honest mistake” that was never intended to hurt Palin.
Rakoff announced in February even before the jury concluded its deliberations that he would dismiss the lawsuit because Pelin had not yet proven that the Times was committing a crime. The same jury rejected Palin’s dress the next day.
Rakoff said he thinks it is fair that all parties not wait for the verdict because he has already decided under the law that Pelin has not proved his point.
His lawyers cited Rakoff’s announcement as a date for retrial.
Source: Huffpost
