adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_judiciales_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
Ollanta Humala and Nadine Heredia, as well as 30 other defendants in the case Southern pipelinemust jointly pay $1.3 billion in civil damages if found guilty of alleged crimes of unlawful association, aggravated conspiracy and money laundering.
The judiciary found the Ad Hoc Attorney Love Jato’s request for this $1 million in civil damages for damages to the state justified.
According to the thesis of the State Ministry, in this case, various government officials and private agents put themselves at the service of a criminal conspiracy led by the then President Humala and his wife, in the interests of the Odebrecht company, a company that was seeking to win the tender for the project along with its Enagás consortium.
Nadine Heredia And Ollanta Humala They also face oral trials over their involvement in alleged irregular participation in the Nationalist Party’s 2006 and 2011 presidential campaigns.
The judiciary has postponed to April 24-28 the testimony of eight Brazilian witnesses against the former presidential couple, which will begin with the testimony of Marcelo Odebrecht, the former CEO of a Brazilian construction company.
They turn down the appeal
The Supreme Court’s Permanent Court of Criminal Cases, presided over by Judge César San Martín, determined last December that the contributions of the Venezuelan government of Hugo Chávez and the Brazilian companies Odebrecht and OAS to the election campaigns of former President Ollanta Humala in 2006 and 2011 did indeed constitute the crime of money laundering . Therefore, it is in court that it will be established whether a crime has been committed.
Judge Manuel Luján Tupes read out a resolution responding to the appeal filed by Humala Tasso, annulling the decision of the second instance confirming the dismissal of the appeal filed under the figure of asset laundering.
In contrast, Chief Prosecutor Cesar Zanabria and Money Laundering Prosecutor Miguel Sánchez Mercado have indicated that the appeal submitted by Humala’s defense should be dismissed because they consider it possible to commit a money laundering offense at all. process steps; therefore, money found in the accounts of a political party would be considered a crime.
Source: RPP
I am Emma White and I currently work for Buna Times. My specialty is the politics section of the website, where I aim to provide readers with informative and engaging content on current events. In addition to my professional experience in journalism, I hold a Bachelor’s degree in English Literature from Princeton University.