adUnits.push({
code: ‘Rpp_politica_judiciales_Nota_Interna1’,
mediaTypes: {
banner: {
sizes: (navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i)) ? [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100]] : [[300, 250], [320, 460], [320, 480], [320, 50], [300, 100], [320, 100], [635, 90]]
}
},
bids: [{
bidder: ‘appnexus’,
params: {
placementId: ‘14149971’
}
},{
bidder: ‘rubicon’,
params: {
accountId: ‘19264’,
siteId: ‘314342’,
zoneId: ‘1604128’
}
},{
bidder: ‘amx’,
params: {
tagId: ‘MTUybWVkaWEuY29t’
}
},{
bidder: ‘oftmedia’,
params: {
placementId: navigator.userAgent.match(/iPhone|android|iPod/i) ? ‘22617692’: ‘22617693’
}
}]
});
Judge José Antonio Neira Flores, member of the Supreme Court’s Special Criminal Division, said that the use of drones and space satellites would also be accepted as evidence in court proceedings, as would be the case for extortion in various forms.
Neira Flores noted that this type of new evidence is added to the so-called traditional ones, such as surveillance, surveillance and monitoring carried out by the National Police, who capture a certain event with their mobile phone, video camera or photos.
The Chief Justice made this assertion by detailing the means of evidence that may be presented by the court. Public servicewhich, with the support National Police They provide information and evidence to the judiciary.
In the same vein, the judge explained that in the case of extortion-related crimes, personal statements, audio recordings, WhatsApp and Facebook messages can also be admitted as evidence.
“The evidence will be personal statements, audio recordings, video recordings of the citizens themselves, WhatsApp, Facebook messages. Prosecutors are asking judges to remove wiretaps, historical records, in order to know who or whom they called, ”he explained.
With regard to the crime of extortion, Neira Flores explained that Article 200 of the Criminal Code states that “anyone, by means of violence, threats or holding a person hostage, compels this or another person to provide a third person with an improper economic benefit or any other and ends when the taxpayer (the victim) performs the provision of illegally claimed money.
As for the penalties, the judge explained that they range from five years to life imprisonment, depending on either form.
Supreme Court warns of sanctions for apologies for terrorism
The National Supreme Court has said that apologizing for terrorism through social media can be punished by a sentence of 8 to 15 years in prison as an aggravated act.
Similarly, as explained by Judge Guillermo Huaman Vargas, President of the First National Collegiate Criminal Court of the National Supreme Court, an apology for terrorism while teaching can be punished by 6 to 10 years in prison.
The judge pointed out that Article 316-A of the Criminal Code penalizes apologia for terrorism against those who extol, justify or glorify the crime of terrorism or a person who has been convicted by a final verdict as an author or participant.
(According to Andina and RPP)
Source: RPP
I am Emma White and I currently work for Buna Times. My specialty is the politics section of the website, where I aim to provide readers with informative and engaging content on current events. In addition to my professional experience in journalism, I hold a Bachelor’s degree in English Literature from Princeton University.