Claire Berest.

Philosopher Mano After Garcia, who Live with menHe has relied on Pelicot’s trial to reflect “Men’s relationship between women, evil, violence, inkestic, gender standards, Claire Berest is studying the case with its own trajectory prism. Always passionate about the news, a large reader, children with a child, the author acquired the heroine’s Grand Prix MEDIME FIGARO With the sister Anna GabriDedicated to their grandmother Gabria buffet picabia. Here he continues to study his evil, focusing on the case, which is in fact different, became different from the capital, as well as his victim, turned into an icon. Interviewer:

MEDIME FIGARO .- You say about Mazan rapists that you need to talk so “intrusion”, “culture of rape.” What do you mean by that? Claire Berest.- The culture of rape, in accordance with the phrase born in the 1970s, saw a systemic disk in sexual violence. They leak all circles and all classes, they are generally in men. In fact, when we notice a group of people who violate the gas delicating, this mass from different individuals understand that the idea of ​​the system is called. The culture of rape is also the idea that many men think that a woman who says it is really what her can do is affecting heavy, attackers or criminals. The culture, however, is formed in mind, is construction, and what I slip on it is a rather absence, empty. These men continue to repeat that not only they do not intend to rape, but they did not understand that they did not know. Of course, this can be a defense strategy, and the concept of “rape culture” is still appropriate, but it hit me something.

You quote Harvey Weinstein but also Epstein Aeration of P. Didy – By allocating that the latter is innocent because the trial is proceeding. What relationship do you make a relationship with Dominic pelikot? Pelicot Affair has many social consequences, which explains that he has broken his goal ball to leak and front page, and therefore repetition. In the fall of these three men, the prince of reagent, the cinema and the quality of music seemed to summarize the situation. The Metro’s revolution destroyed the procedure for so long in all spheres. These three men had financial strength, strength, exceptional greatness, and therefore the feeling of force and impunity, which eliminated their compass. And now, the Dominic Pelicott is now caused by financial problems for his whole life, but who, if not, if it is normally embodied. Address book, networks, dedicated workers, but he was able to install almost as many complex systems and lead to dozens of men to his wake. About fifty, but seventy …

And here we learn that 70,000 men exchanged advice Telegram In order to break the women, we understand that you are returning to the “unfavorable evil”, which works so hard on the Pelicot Case … Yes, sometimes with pirucs such as “men’s duck” … I considered it important to return to the roots of this resolution, that Anna did Eichman in JerusalemWe have called a lot of “evil nature.” Dominic Phelicot was the incarnation of evil, perversion, perversion, who would become a crime, as evil says that Arent spreads mushrooms. For others, it is a pelicot who will be symbolic of evil nature. He is evil, because Fournire, Guy Georges or Marc Dutroux are evil, he has become a picture of a crime, and at the same time he turned his wife. A man who was employed in the electricity company before becoming small boxes described as a generous boy, whose passions seem to be the “evil roof” of the chosen focal length.

Arent also takes you to another philosopher, Simone Weil for which the real mystery is evil, but good … We have a subject for the cape that Ericman played idiots during his trial, the man who was pleased to obey his commands when he was very smart. But on the one hand, we can be full of brilliant, literate, cultivated and hatred, and we see it with Céline, and the other hand, Arent has traveled on its position that does not think about that type of intelligence. For him, the lack of intelligence for him was due to the disability of him really. And here’s where Hannah Arendt is, for which it is better to present what is from the other. – We see it every day for information, but it is not satanic, and it is not deep, unlike the good, self-suffertive, which is endowed with real depth.

Real depth that seems likely to obtain. Absolutely without planned or intellectual. Gisèle Pelicot was destroyed – his whole past, his memory, his marriage, his love, he did not say at that time. Rehabilitation method for another justice In fact, it is one of the only crimes where the victim feels guilty and where the guilty makes him sacrifice. Evil is imported to the other at the same time as the pain, at the same time abuse, at the same time as contempt. And Simone Wale had a neighboring idea in the 1940s. Of course, he doesn’t talk about sexual violence, but about “misfortune” that evil is not only forced, but also transmitted to the victim. Initially, by lifting the closed door, at attending the court hearing, Gisèle Pelicot wanted to remove that misfortune, which he did not have any more imprisoned. He did not decide to become an icon, but he became. When he got up, he, in his turn, raised us, he nourished us. He got up. There was this light in the whole mud of this job too.