Updates on the rumors of an alleged fight among those in NJZ members (Newjeans) points out that Hyein’s parents who disagreed
The first hearing in the Central District Court of Seoul referring to the judicial process between the label and the members of the NJZ, former Newjeans, for validation of the exclusive contract of artists, rumors about a possible disagreement by parents of the two minors of age, are due to the NJZ record label. Haerin and Hyeincame up.
At first, the South Korean media stated that those responsible for the alleged fight were the parents of Haerinafter the judge of the case questioning the validation of parental rights, whose families need legal agreement for contractual decisions because they are minors. Internet users intensified the accusation after obtaining one of the reports of the case that stated that the singer’s mother was the only one not to agree with the breach of the exclusive contract with the company.
Although the guardians came to public last Friday, 04, to clarify the rumors and deny the accusation on Tuesday, 08, it was reported by the press that those involved in the misunderstanding were the parents of the group’s Maknae, Hyeininstead of Haerin.
During an investigation written by the South Korean press vehicle, New Daily, it was found that in fact the person who opposed NJZ’s contractual termination was the father of the youngest member. Also according to the investigation, disagreement resulted in an action between the artist’s own parents, involving the definition of who would have the legal right to act as his tutor in court (via Koreaboo).
The confusion around the guardian’s identity intensified after judicial records named Defendant 4 with the surname “Kang”, Leading the public to believe that the case involved Haerinwhich has this same surname. As Hyein It is also smaller, your parents are also in the file as defendants, which made it difficult to identify correctly.
According to New Daily, the young singer’s father initially supported NJZ’s contractual termination request to the ador on November 29, 2023, with the other responsible. However, at a later time, he would have changed his position and began to oppose the process, starting a legal dispute with the artist’s mother about whom he would have legitimacy to represent her in court.
Subsequently, the Court decided to limit the authority of the parent contrast and continued based on the consent of the other responsible.
Source: Recreio
