Accusations took place today, the 17th, in the first hearing of the injunction instituted in order to prevent ADOR’s CEO, Min Hee Jin, from losing her position in the company
The first hearing of the injunction opened by the businesswoman Min Hee Jinagainst HYBE to prevent her from being fired from her position as CEO of LOVEtook place today, the 17th, at the Seoul Central District Court, where both sides were able to address the recent accusations, as well as make new ones, such as the one made by the conglomerate, which states that Min Hee Jin he mistreated conglomerate employees with misogynistic comments and attitudes.
Misogyny is equivalent to hatred against women, and can be observed in hostile, prejudiced, exclusionary, derogatory, discriminatory and violent behaviors, including the contribution to the creation and maintenance of systems and environments that instigate inequality between genders and the belief in male superiority .
Thus, HYBE alleged that in March 2024, when the vice president (who only received the letter “L” as identification) was accused of sexually harassing ADOR employees, Min Hee Jin pressured victims to “adopt a submissive attitude” and made “unimaginably misogynistic comments,” representatives of the conglomerate said.
Furthermore, the company stated that Min Hee Jin She referred to her co-workers as “gae-jumma”. According to the Koreaboo portal, this is a pejorative term that took shape from the combination of the Korean words for dog (gae) and old woman (ahjumma).
More than that, the CEO was also accused of using the term “femi” with other employees, a shortened version of “feminist”, which in South Korea is seen as a derogatory label, used for those who act against gender discrimination. gender and female empowerment.
HYBE
It is worth remembering that the HYBE One of the parent company’s first actions was to request the resignation of Min Hee Jin of the position of CEO.
At the time, ADOR denied the attempt to separate itself from HYBE, as well as declaring that the reason for the conflict is, in fact, alleged plagiarism on the part of BELIFT LAB, which had copied the NewJeans concept for ILLIT. The case remains ongoing.
Source: Recreio
